The ETF Authority for Monday, July 14th, 2003 Volume 2, Issue #28 Published weekly on Sunday evening, The ETF Authority is a short-term trading newsletter that can help you profit from some of the most heavily-traded securities on the market -- exchange-traded funds (ETFs). *Please
Note: This
is a fee-paid, subscribers-only newsletter.
Any republication or retransmission of this web page or any of the
contents herein is expressly prohibited. Click on the link below to
subscribe to this newsletter today... We urge all readers to print out this
newsletter each week for maximum benefit... (1.) MARKET SUMMARY The State of the State I believe that we are still working off the overbought condition from July. One typical pattern that prices will often trace out is that of a "triangle." A triangle means that prices trade in a continuously narrowing price range. The S&P 500 may be tracing out just such a pattern (see chart below). I would expect the ultimate break to be to higher levels, but we might see another week or two of sideways price action before that next move occurs.
More Technicals Option Expiry With prices so near their recent highs, there is substantial risk for a turn lower. That said, options expiry is not a good enough reason to get short, but it is a good reason to be cautious about buying breakouts (moves into new high price territory). The Bottom Line
THE WEEK IN REVIEW There is an interesting dichotomy going on here from a behavioral perspective. Short-term analysts and traders seem to be losing their nerve, as prices have now trended sideways (without making a new high) for the longest period of time we've seen since the market bottomed in March. Meanwhile, we are starting to see economists raise their expectations for economic growth. Both of these behaviors cannot coexist for an extended period of time. Ultimately, I expect the short-term game will first hurt the naysayers (stocks should rally), and after that to clobber the economists (after rallying, stocks should tumble to new lows). Remember -- the market often acts as a pain maximizer, and if it does what I expect it to do in the coming months, then it will likely cost investors a significant amount of money. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS Next week will bring a slew of data. The Empire State Index, which measures economic activity in New York State, is due on Tuesday. That index gave quite a stir last month when it unexpectedly jumped to 26.8. The forecast for this month is near 17.0, but the actual figure could be worse. However, keep in mind that this index is quite new and is not widely followed. Retail sales are far more important, and this data is due out on July 15th as well. Forecasts are for a gain of between +0.1% and +0.3% with vehicle sales seen at a similar number. The way retail stocks have traded recently, somebody is expecting strength there, and with much higher energy prices last month, the risk is to a stronger-than-expected gain in retail sales. Why, you ask, should a jump in energy prices help retail sales? I'm glad you asked. One segment of retail sales comes from gas stations. If prices rise at the pump, then that pushes total sales higher (unless, of course, the number of gallons bought falls). Retail sales are not adjusted for inflation, so if prices rise, then so do retail sales (all other things being equal, as the economists say). Wednesday begets the Consumer Price Index (CPI). I don't foresee any problems there, as both the core CPI and total CPI are expected to come in between flat and +0.1%. The core CPI jumped +0.3% last month, so another similar gain will get the inflationists roaring. I doubt that will be a problem. Capacity Utilization and Industrial Production are forecast to be barely changed (due out on July 16th at 9:15 PM ET). These proxies for Gross Domestic Product remain moribund. The only place where there is joy in Mudville comes from the housing sector. Forecasts for building permits and housing starts (due out on July 17th) are for 1.83 million (annual rate) and up. However, given the recent spike in interest rates, we could see these levels moderate from last month's 1.803 million and 1.732 million, respectively. The 17th also sees the Philadelphia Fed Index (cousin to the Empire State Index). Forecasts are for a drop to 4.0, but a negative reading here isn't out of the question. And finally, consumer sentiment (University of Michigan) should drop when it is released on July 18th (Friday). WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? The most likely outcome is that prices will continue to trend sideways this week (meaning the options expiration will not have a major impact), and that the market will break higher later this month, only to turn down between mid-August and mid-September. For now, however, I'm going to buy on the dips.
http://www.StreetAuthority.com/subscribe-etf.htm Below you'll find a table of weekly performance data for all ETFs that I track for this newsletter...
(3.) ETF RELATIVE STRENGTH MONITOR (Note: If you're a first-time reader or you are otherwise unfamiliar with our proprietary ETF Relative Strength Monitor, then please click here for a brief description.) It was a good week in ETF land. Only four funds fell last week, with Oil Service HOLDRS (OIH, $58.50) taking over last place in our Relative Strength Monitor after falling -2.74%. We purchased OIH on Monday at $58.50 for our Model ETF Portfolio, so we now hold a long position in this security. If this fund does not start to move up quickly, then we will jettison it. Last week's worst performer among the ETFs we track, however, was the Canadian WEBS (EWC, $11.56), which sank -2.94% as the Canadian dollar fell sharply (see last week's discussion of the Japan WEBS to get an example of how of the currency market can affect your foreign stock market holdings). Also losing ground last week were the Pharmaceutical HOLDRS (PPH, $80.84). I have had a short recommendation outstanding on that ETF for a couple of weeks, but PPH has not been able to rally up to my sell level. I have now decided to cancel that recommendation, as there are better plays in the market right now. The top performer among the ETFs we track was the Semiconductor HOLDR (SMH, $31.18), which gained 6.6% for the week. SMH was the subject of our two News Flashes last week, as I sought to buy this fund on a pullback. Although prices did dip, they did not fall far enough to give us a good entry price. The Nasdaq Biotech iShares (IBB, $72.85) ranked second on last week's list of winners, jumping +6.51%. We are long IBB in our model portfolio, and those strong gains helped us to just about keep pace with the S&P 500 even though we are holding more than 60% of our portfolio in cash right now. Here is this week's ETF Relative Strength Monitor...
S&P 500 Model Portfolio We just about kept pace with the S&P 500 last week, despite getting stopped on our Japan WEBS trade (EWJ, $7.84). The fund's high was $8.12 and it had gapped higher at the open on Monday (where we shorted it). I set our stop loss very tight on this trade, as I had not really expected it to move that high. By the end of the week, EWJ had declined more than 2% below our original sell level. We also bought the Oil Service HOLDRS (OIH, $58.50) last week. As you saw in our Relative Strength Monitor section above, OIH is ranked last in our Monitor. In addition, its meager +4.07% gain over the past 13 weeks puts it last among the equity-based funds we track. OIH is also down -7.66% over four weeks, which also ranks it as the worst performer among all ETFs we track for that period. Although OIH is not oversold, it appears to have completed its period of underperforming the S&P 500. The chart below shows the price of OIH divided by the price of the S&P 500 (a falling line means OIH is underperforming the S&P 500). As you can see in the lower panel below, stochastics have been making higher lows, indicating that OIH's underperformance is running out of steam. This may not bode well for the overall market either, as OIH has often performed well during recent market downturns.
In other trading action, we were stopped out of our Japan WEBS trade (EWJ, $7.84) last week, but this fund remains poised for a near-term selloff. We're going to short 500 shares of EWJ at the open on Monday, and will set our initial stop loss at $8.20. Since this will also be our trade of the week as well, I will discuss EWJ in greater detail below. This week's instructions are:
MODEL ETF PORTFOLIO
SELL SHORT 500 SHARES JAPAN iSHARES MSCI WEBS (EWJ,
$7.84)
SELL SHORT 500 SHARES OF EWJ AT THE OPEN ON MONDAY, JULY 7TH, LIMIT $7.67. YOU MAY SHORT THIS FUND ON A MOVE BACK ABOVE $7.67. TARGET: $7.16 Assuming a sale at Friday's
$7.84 close and a purchase at our $7.16 target, you would make $340 from
this trade, or +8.7%. (6.) CONTINUED GUIDANCE ON PREVIOUS TRADES SELL SHORT 100 SHARES PHARMACEUTICAL HOLDR (PPH, $80.84) ON A BOUNCE, AND AT THE SAME TIME BUY 20 SHARES OF ELI LILLY (LLY, $69.27) I have decided to CANCEL this trade. Although PPH continues to underperform the market, I do not want to have two short trades on at the same time until stocks start to fall. PPH often outperforms in a weak market, so if stocks turn, then I'd rather short an overbought ETF. RECOMMENDATION: RETAIL HOLDRS (RTH, $83.95) HOLDRS, which are managed by brokerage giant Merrill Lynch, are a bit different from traditional ETFs in the way they trade and in their expense ratios. (There are some other technical issues that you might want to discuss with your tax advisor as well, after you've read the prospectus.) For example, you cannot buy or sell less than 100 shares of a HOLDR in any transaction. However, they are still exempt from the uptick rule (the uptick rule says that you cannot short a stock unless the last price change in the stock was to a higher price). Unlike most other types of funds, which track broad-based indices that contain hundreds (or some cases even thousands) of stocks, HOLDRS consist of just a handful of stocks and are designed to track particular industry groups. Because they only track a few companies, HOLDRS are very inexpensive to manage. However, because they aren't highly diversified, HOLDRS tend to be much more volatile than the average ETF. This lack of diversification is worth discussing further. Many HOLDRS are very heavily weighted in just one or two individual stocks. When it comes to the Retail HOLDRS (RTH, $83.95), for example, Wal-Mart (WMT, $56.53) accounts for more than 24% of the value of the fund. Meanwhile, Home Depot (HD, $33.17) contributes another 16%, meaning that these two stocks comprise more than 40% of the value of the fund! In my special report -- What Every ETF Trader Needs to Know: How to Protect Your Trade When Everything Looks Right -- which I've reserved only for one- and two-year ETF Authority subscribers, I discuss the importance of knowing what the charts of the main holdings in a particular HOLDR look like. With earnings season upon us (earnings surprises often cause individual stocks to move strongly in one direction or the other), it will become even more important for investors to analyze the specific holdings within these highly concentrated securities. In my special report I also show you how to hedge these funds against moves in stocks that make up a large percentage of a particular HOLDR. (You can view the exact makeup of each HOLDR at Merrill Lynch's dedicated HOLDRS web site -- http://www.holdrs.com.) Each HOLDR consists of 100 shares of stock, and these shares are divided unevenly among the companies within the HOLDR. The Retail HOLDRS, for example, contain 36 shares of Wal-Mart. If you were bullish on the retail sector but were nervous about Wal-Mart's prospects, then you could buy 100 shares of RTH and at the same time short 36 shares of Wal-Mart. After doing so, you'd essentially own RTH without Wal-Mart in it. The Retail HOLDRS invest in stocks of companies that are in the retail business -- stores that sell directly to consumers. I've listed the fund's top 10 holdings in the table below. These make up more than 70% of the value of the fund, and there are only 21 stocks in the whole trust. Despite taking it on the chin in 2002 and early 2003, retail stocks have performed well as of late, and a number of major retail companies are now approaching their 2000 highs. For example, electronics retailer Best Buy (BBY, $45.40) has nearly tripled from its October 2002 low of $16.99, but it is still below its March 2002 high of $53.75 and its April 2000 peak of $59.25.
The pattern in RTH itself is actually quite sloppy. There have been several stellar performers, as noted above, in the fund, and a few real dogs as well (check out KSS, WAG and MAY). The overriding story is that the fund has room to rally further from today's levels. However, I doubt that the fund will rally much further than the 61.8% retracement to its 2002 high ($87.32). We had a clear breakout last week, but another 3% or so gain should just about do it. After that, there is risk of a drop to a new low.
However, the more likely scenario is that RTH will not actually take out its March 2003 nadir. After all, the charts of some of this HOLDRS' constituents (not shown here) look fairly strong. For example, Home Depot (HD) has been in a nice uptrend, and I do not have any real reason to expect it to tumble to new lows (there is a short-term double top there that bears watching). Meanwhile, Wal-Mart (WMT) is in a triangle formation, as is another of the fund's components -- Best Buy. Barring major negative developments elsewhere, new lows appear a bit far fetched for RTH, but a 15-20% fall from the highs is likely to start within the next couple of weeks. RTH may turn before the overall market. (8.) WEEKLY EDUCATIONAL BONUS -- WHAT IS A TREND AND HOW DO I IDENTIFY ONE? I am always talking about the market's trend, but what is a trend? In layman's terms, a trend can be defined as the market's overall direction, which means it can take three possible paths: Up, Down and Sideways. An uptrend is defined as a series of higher highs and higher lows. A downtrend is identified by lower highs and lower lows. A sideways trend is identified by a lack of market direction (and traders pulling large clumps of hair out of their heads). Timeframe
The correct answer is: up and sideways. Although that might seem like an unusual answer, it is actually the correct one. The gap higher that started last week allowed prices to rise above the big red candlestick from late June. That gave IBB a new high with an interim low above the prior low. So, the short-term trend is a positive one. However, IBB has yet to exceed its early-June high, so this fund's medium-term trend is actually sideways. If prices break out above the early-June peak, then we will be able to say that the medium-term trend is also up. However, if prices first drop below IBB's low from the latter part of June, then we'd say the medium-term trend is down. I have not shown a longer-term chart here. As an exercise, I generally look at a monthly chart to determine that trend. Of course, this analysis is all too simple, and I have not yet burned enough trees with this week's report, so I will now complicate things a bit more for you. Moving Averages Many trading systems are built off moving averages. A simple one is to buy when price crosses above the 20-day moving average and sell when it falls below the 20-day moving average. This works well when the market is trending nicely in one direction, but if the market is trending sideways, then look out! In this particular case, you could lose giant sums of money as a stock's price crosses back and forth over its moving average, earning your broker a nice living while lowering your net worth at the same time. Look at the sample chart above. Assuming you sold the morning after IBB closed below its 20-day moving average in June, you would have been stopped for a pretty good-sized loss. Late February into early March, and part of April also, would have resulted in losses. However, the huge gain from mid-April into June would have more than made up for those losses. To help out with trendless markets, you can filter your moving average system with an indicator that helps identify whether the market is trending strongly or not (such as the Average Directional Index, or ADX, which I wrote about in our June 16th ETF Authority issue). Trendlines and Channels Summary Thanks again for reading this week's issue, and good trading in the week ahead!
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABOUT OUR
EMAIL POLICY You are receiving this email because you visited StreetAuthority.com and subscribed to our premium ETF AUTHORITY service. This newsletter is sent out only to paid subscribers and limited-time free-trial members. If you feel you have received this issue in error, or if this email was forwarded to you without our express written permission, please contact us by visiting our web site at the link below. We sincerely hope that you benefit from your subscription to our
premium ETF AUTHORITY service, and we’re willing to do
whatever it takes to keep you as a satisfied customer. If at any time you
would like to contact us (for example, to make a recommendation or to
inquire about your account), you can do so by visiting our web site at ADVERTISING INFORMATION ===================================== DISCLAIMER The information contained herein does not constitute a representation by the publisher or a solicitation for the purchase or sale of securities. Our opinions and analyses are based on sources believed to be reliable and are written in good faith, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to their accuracy or completeness. All information contained in this report should be independently verified with the companies mentioned. The editor and publisher are not responsible for errors or omissions. StreetAuthority receives no compensation of any kind from any companies that may be mentioned in our newsletters or on our web site. Any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Owners, employees and writers may hold positions in the securities that are discussed in this report or on our web site, but are barred from trading any of these securities seven days before and after the initial publication of this report in accordance with our company policies. (c) Copyright 2003. StreetAuthority LLC and Poser
Global Market Strategies Inc. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||