Important Updates for Investors
Carla Pasternak's Premiere Issue of High-Yield International Just
Released
Income expert Carla Pasternak's debut issue of High-Yield
International covers a Taiwanese manufacturer yielding 9.5%... a
rare Mexican monopoly yielding 13.4%... and other top-performing
investments yielding up to 19.0%.
Government's Biofuel Timetable Could Spell +15,900% Growth
+15,900% growth might seem far-fetched... but it's not. In fact, it
is mandated by law. And I've identified the ONLY stock positioned to
capture this growth.
The
Silver Lining to a Falling Dollar
Despite the U.S. national debt, there is a silver lining for income
investors. This massive spending, combined with movement out of U.S.
Treasuries, is going to take its toll on the dollar, and
international income investors could reap the rewards in the form of
higher dividends. |
|
|

|
|
Answers to Your Questions About Profiting From
Government Actions |
[http://www.streetauthority.com/includes/article-top-ao.htm]Published:
May 14, 2009
My in-box is flooded. The other applications on my desktop are
lining up two by two. It's been a deluge.
I have 40 pages -- 40 single-spaced pages -- of questions from readers
about how they can benefit from government action. This topic has
engendered more feedback than any other in StreetAuthority's history.
Investors are clamoring to learn just how they can profit from the
greatest financial force on the planet.
An informed investor will be a successful investor. Let's take a look at
those questions -- and the answers.
Let's look at some of the most
popular questions you and your fellow investors are asking:
What do you consider to be the areas and industries that
will benefit most from the stimulus support during this
economic crisis?
Infrastructure, alternative energy and health care were
the big winners in the stimulus bill.
I've identified the winners in each of these areas. But
government action is more than the stimulus bill and the
bailouts. There are dozens of other sectors that will benefit
from government action long after the stimulus is behind us
and the nation has resumed its solid financial footing.
There's no end to the profit opportunities!
Will bank stocks recover?
Yes. The financial system simply cannot function without
healthy, profitable banks. And though we hear lots of dire
news about banking, in the long term this will prove to be
an extremely profitable sector to invest in.
All banks face challenges during downturns, and most have managed
well during this one. A few of the larger banks whose misjudgments
helped create this crisis will face a long hard slog. But the banks
that are already clamoring to pay back their TARP funds have come
through the woods and are ready to get back to business -- and get
the government out of their hair! In the meantime, many banks are
trading at a discount and will be superb investments.
Government spending is but one "big
trend." When this trend plays out (even when companies
become fully valued), what next?
Government spending has been a
"big trend" --and an upward one -- for more than
200
years. It's not going anywhere.
The country won't need massive stimulus forever. But that
doesn't mean the end of the profitable investing
opportunities. Consider: The stimulus package was $787
billion. But the current federal budget, on the other hand,
is $3.5 trillion. That's for one year. Uncle Sam's annual
spending will amount to fully one quarter of GDP. Every time
one of those public dollars is spent, a private-sector
profit is realized. This "big trend" isn't a flash in the
pan. It's not going to abate or subside. There will always
be government-driven profit opportunities, both in this
country and around the world.
How much is the government going to
control usage of funds?
Down to the penny. The Treasury
allocated funds for what it is told to buy, and all spending
bills, according to the U.S. Constitution, must originate in
the House of Representatives. Richard Nixon tried impounding
funds that were destined for programs he opposed, but the
courts overruled him. (And Congress was less than pleased.)
How come they did not let Warren Buffett become the
Treasury Secretary?
That might not be a bad idea. Buffett has an obligation
to the shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway that he takes very
seriously. He's often written about how much he loves his
job -- that he "tap dances" to work every morning. Buffett
is evidently satisfied to have moved on from working in
Washington, where his last job was delivering newspapers
when he lived there as a boy (his father, a Republican,
represented Nebraska in Congress).
Buffett supported Obama's candidacy: Campaign databases show he and all three of his children gave
thousands of dollars to the campaign. And Buffett is not
shaking off his patriotic duty: He serves as an economic
adviser to the president. You can bet that, unlike
the auto executives, no one is going to complain if Buffett
comes in Washington in his private jet.
Does government involvement ever work? Can
we find instances that it has worked in the past?
Samuel Broder, the former director
of the National Cancer Institute, shared your dim view of
the government's ability to do anything right. "If you had
demanded that the National Institute of Health solve
the problem of polio, the odds are very strong that you
would get the very best iron lungs in the world, but you
wouldn't get the vaccine."
In many ways I share this viewpoint of the government's
abilities, such as they are.
But this assessment notwithstanding, the fact remains that
the government, setting aside its outcomes, spends
$400
million an hour. When those dollars are spent,
wise investors profit even if the problems the government
was seeking to address remain unsolved. Does government
involvement work? Depends on your perspective. I see a lot
of profits to be made. That's my perspective, and it works
for me.
Any mutual fund available for this?
No. There isn't a mutual fund that focuses on profiting
from government action. Nor is there an ETF that is
specifically designed for this express purpose. This method
of investing requires active participation and a thorough
study of executive priorities, legislation, regulation,
budgets, court cases and the like. Fortunately,
Government-Driven Investing condenses that vast
subject matter into readable, digestible form. It analyzes
which companies will be affected and clearly and explicitly
shows investors how to profit.
Since ethanol does NOT work-why is the land still not
used for corn, beans or other useful crops to help the world
feed the masses?
Ethanol -- the typically corn-based fuel additive --
certainly has its drawbacks. But the administration is
devoted to biofuels. And remember, the only place ethanol
doesn't work is on a profit-and-loss statement. But the
government isn't in the business of making money, it's in
the business of printing it. That's a critical distinction.
Ethanol is an area that the president likes, and he's in a
position to direct funding to it. Savvy investors can put
themselves into a position to profit from that.
Does it matter whether the government is
liberal or conservative?
No. We made recommendations for defense and homeland
security stocks that did very well under Bush. We've made
picks since Obama came to the White House that have
delivered even bigger results. It doesn't
matter whether there is a Democratic or Republican president in the
White House, or who controls Congress. Both sides spend, spend,
spend. Both sides create opportunity for immense profits.
Government-Driven Investing shows how to capture them.
How can we tell what stimulus spending is
one-time-only funding and which amounts are to be followed
up with continued government sponsorship?
All of the stimulus spending -- every cent -- was a one-shot
deal. The $787 billion will be spent and, after that, the
stimulus is over. The thinking is that there are enough
dollars going to enough parts of the economy to help pull
the entire nation out of its slump.
That said, many of the things that the government is
spending stimulus money on will indeed have a long-term
effect. Take digital medical records. The stimulus package
has a one-time $19 billion earmark for this area.
But once the system is in place, it will have to be
continually maintained and upgraded. When new hospitals or
clinics open, they will need to buy digital-medical records
software. The $19 billion shot in the arm is simply a
catalyst for a major industry change. It will generate
business -- and profits for years. I identified four
companies that will benefit the most from the push to
digital medical records in the inaugural issue of
Government-Driven Investing.
We will continue to
follow this and other areas that will reap windfalls from
government spending going forward.
My biggest fear about government-driven investing is that
spending will be cut or priorities will change.
Both of those are very real possibilities. Now, on the
whole, I don't think we're going to see any spending cuts
for some time -- the era of the trillion-dollar deficit is
here. (Say what you want about Bill Clinton, he delivered
budget surpluses.) But when I hear investors express fear
that spending will be cut or priorities will change, what I
hear is that they aren't sure how to keep track of the
federal bureaucracy. And who can blame them? They federal
complex is massive. Millions of bureaucrats spend trillions
of dollars each year -- it's a lot to say grace over. The
rules for successful investing are the same as the rules for
success on the battlefield: Good intelligence assures
victory. That's where
Government-Driven Investing
comes in.
Won't all this spending cause inflation?
This was the No. 1 question we received. The answer
is a resounding YES.
Inflation is inevitable. Governments can't create 13-digit
budget deficits without engendering some devaluation of the
currency. At this point, no one
knows the exact
degree to which the stimulus plan will effect inflation. But
while $787 billion is a mind-blowing amount of money to
you and me, the appropriation "only" amounts to 22.5% of the
government's annual budget. That's a big number, but whether
it is large enough to significantly impact inflation remains
to be seen.
Bear this in mind, though: The historical inflation rate in
this country for the past 10 years averages out to +2.6%.
During the same period, the S&P 500 index has achieved an
annual gain -- almost invisible to the naked eye -- of
+0.68%. Say inflation doubles. At that point, the question
is this: Can you beat a 5.88% return? If so, you're in the
plus column: You outpaced both inflation and the market. Our
Obama-related picks have already seen gains
three, four,
five times that -- just since Obama took the White House!
Some of those stocks are just getting warmed up, too.
Inflation can be scary, and it's all the more reason why you
need to find a way to generate the strongest gains you can.
Investing in companies that will see double-digit returns --
or more -- as a direct result of government action is the
surest way I know of to keep inflation at bay.
- - -
I hope today's issue has helped answer your questions.
All investors should devote a
portion of their portfolios to capturing the gains generated
by government action. To learn how you can profit,
click
here.
Many happy returns!
[http://www.streetauthority.com/includes/editor-profiles-ao.htm]
Disclosure: Andy Obermueller
does not own any shares
mentioned in this article.
|
|
Investing Doesn't Get Any Easier Than This |
Stock picker Amy
Calistri's strategy is as simple as investing gets -- just one idea
a month designed to make money in today's market. Invest this way
and you don't have to worry about oil prices, automaker bailouts, or
what the Fed is up to -- because every "bad" economic development
actually helps some investment or another.Your investing life can
get a lot simpler -- starting today.
Go here to learn about Amy's simple investing strategy.
|
|
|