Important Updates for Investors
Carla Pasternak's Premiere Issue of High-Yield International Just
Released
Income expert Carla Pasternak's debut issue of High-Yield
International covers a Taiwanese manufacturer yielding 9.5%... a
rare Mexican monopoly yielding 13.4%... and other top-performing
investments yielding up to 19.0%.
Government's Biofuel Timetable Could Spell +15,900% Growth
+15,900% growth might seem far-fetched... but it's not. In fact, it
is mandated by law. And I've identified the ONLY stock positioned to
capture this growth.
The
Silver Lining to a Falling Dollar
Despite the U.S. national debt, there is a silver lining for income
investors. This massive spending, combined with movement out of U.S.
Treasuries, is going to take its toll on the dollar, and
international income investors could reap the rewards in the form of
higher dividends. |
|
|

|
| Pharmaceutical
HOLDR (PPH) |
Published: October 6, 2004
The Pharmaceutical HOLDR (PPH) is an exchange-traded
fund that tracks the shares of 21 of the world's largest drugmakers. The
fund's largest holdings include (ticker symbol, weight in fund) Pfizer
(PFE, 24.88%), Johnson and Johnson (JNJ, 20.53%) and Merck (MRK,
10.18%). Like all HOLDRs, the fund is comprised of a limited number of
stocks. PPH's top 10 holdings account for nearly 93% of the fund's
value. This means that you must be very cognizant of earnings and other
announcements for each of the fund's individual holdings. It also means that it is a good
idea to review the charts of the fund's largest components in order to
get a feel for what the individual stock situations look like.
Why should you do this? Simple: You might see a developing reversal or
continuation pattern that would give you reason to alter your outlook
for the entire HOLDR. The other possibility is that one particular issue
may be trading in the opposite direction relative to the rest of the fund. If
this were a highly diverse ETF, then there would be no reason for action.
However, in a situation where several issues account for 5% or more of
the fund's value, you might wish to hedge that stock's weight in the
fund. This can be done with a position opposite to the stock's slice of
the fund, or with options.
It is very easy to determine how many shares you need to hedge. Merrill
Lynch, which issues the HOLDRs, offers a wealth of information on its
web site at http://www.holdrs.com.
Here you'll find how many shares of each individual stock are contained
within each 100-share lot of a given HOLDR. Unlike other ETFs, these
numbers never change, except for by corporate action (splits, mergers
and acquisitions, etc).
How important is this? Well, if you had a negative opinion regarding
Merck prior to September 30, 2004, then you would have saved yourself a
whole lot of money when MRK plummeted last week. PPH fell $2.89 that
day, and its net asset value (NAV) tumbled $2.78. Of that loss, a full
$2.65 was directly attributable to the sharp decline in Merck. If you
had shorted 14 shares of Merck, then your losses would have been a
fraction of a percent instead of more than 3%.
PPH holds many of the same stocks as the Healthcare SPDR (XLV). Its
correlation though is only about 88% because XLV also includes other
healthcare industry firms, such as HMOs. The fund does not closely track
the Biotech HOLDR (BBH). PPH's correlation with that fund is just
63%--about the same as its correlation with the Nasdaq Composite (^COMPQ).
Pharmaceutical companies have had a long history of fruitful research
and development (R&D). Despite the fact that the business is mature,
the constant discovery of new drugs has allowed these firms to sport
higher-than-average P/E (price/earnings) ratios. However, an uncertain
regulatory environment has probably resulted in less effective and
substantial R&D in recent years. This has led to a much smaller
pipeline of new drugs on the horizon. Large drug companies also seem to
have been quicker to drop their association with biotech firms, thus
missing the opportunity to share in the revenue stream from new drugs
developed by this up-and-coming industry. These issues will impact the returns for pharmaceutical stocks
for years to come.
| Pharmaceutical
HOLDR (PPH) |
|
|
| Type: |
Sector |
|
|
|
|
| Similar funds: |
Healthcare
SPDR (XLV) |
|
|
Biotech
HOLDR (BBH) |
|
| Options?: |
Yes, illiquid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance
Data |
|
|
|
|
| 52-week High: |
$84.25 |
2/12/2004 |
|
Annualized
return since: |
| 52-week Low: |
$70.93 |
9/30/2004 |
|
One-year |
-2.44% |
| YTD Return: |
-7.73% |
(as
of 9/17/2004) |
Three-year |
-8.64% |
|
|
|
|
Five-year |
N/A |
| Dividends: |
$1.62 |
past 12-mos |
Life of fund* |
-2.41% |
| Expense: |
$0.08/share
per year |
|
*
- Started trading 2/1/2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Correlation
Data* |
(1/02/02-9/30/04) |
Holdings* |
(as of
9/30/2004) |
| Dow
Jones Industrials |
77.1% |
|
Pfizer
(PFE) |
24.88% |
| S&P 500 |
|
76.7% |
|
Johnson&Johnson
(JNJ) |
20.53% |
| Nasdaq
Composite |
63.2% |
|
Merck
(MRK) |
10.18% |
| Nasdaq-100 |
|
60.7% |
|
Eli
Lilly (LLY) |
8.42% |
|
|
|
|
Abbott
Lab (ABT) |
8.31% |
| XLV |
|
87.9% |
|
Wyeth
(WYE) |
6.29% |
| BBH |
|
63.1% |
|
Bristol-Myers (BMY) |
5.98% |
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough
(SGP) |
3.74% |
|
|
|
|
Forrest
Lab (FRX) |
2.52% |
|
|
|
|
Zimmer
Holdings (ZMH) |
1.99% |
|
|
|
|
*
Percent top ten are of total |
92.84% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Average
Daily Volume |
|
Average
Daily Price Range |
| Aug-04 |
498,376 |
|
|
Aug-04 |
0.9% |
| 2004 YTD |
608,578 |
|
|
2004 YTD |
1.2% |
| 2003 |
499,990 |
|
|
2003 |
1.6% |
| *
- Correlation measures how closely the two items track each
other |
|
*
Includes prior day's close (true range) |
A quick reminder about HOLDRS...
HOLDRS, which are managed by brokerage giant Merrill Lynch, are a bit
different from traditional ETFs in the way they trade and in their
expense ratios. For example, you cannot buy or sell fewer than 100
shares of a HOLDR in any transaction. Instead, these unique instruments
can only be traded in 100-share round lots. In addition, unlike most
other types of funds, which track broad-based indices that contain
hundreds (or some cases even thousands) of stocks, most HOLDRS consist
of just a handful of stocks and are designed to track a particular
industry group.
Because they only track a few companies, HOLDRS are very inexpensive to
manage. However, because they aren't highly diversified, they also tend
to be much more volatile than your average ETFs. HOLDRS also directly
pass through any distributions the underlying securities make. This may
lead to tax consequences different than what you would expect from an
ordinary ETF. Note that because the fund's components never change,
corporate restructurings and changes could ultimately result in a HOLDR
no longer being representative of its original sector design. After
purchasing a HOLDR, you will receive annual and quarterly reports from
each individual company held by the fund.
HOW TO MAKE MONEY IN PPH THIS YEAR
There remains substantial risk in holding the shares of drug companies.
As the U.S. quickly approaches a Presidential election, the winner will
almost certainly have a large say in how the prices of these shares
react. A win by Senator Kerry would almost certainly result in a
knee-jerk negative reaction. The market would assume that Kerry would
put further pressure on big pharma to reign in prices to American
consumers. For years, U.S. buyers have footed the bill for R&D. By
contrast, many foreign governments limit the prices that drug companies
may charge.
This price imbalance has led to a new cottage industry. You can now
buy many prescriptions from pharmacies over the border in Canada. The
drug companies have bitterly fought this, as these drugs can cost 30% to
50% less (even with the Canadian dollar's recent appreciation against
the U.S. dollar) when you buy them in Canada. Although it is illegal to
resell Canadian drugs, the firms providing this service only act as an
introducer to the Canadian pharmacy; they never touch the drugs.
Individuals are permitted to bring in prescription items as long as it
is for personal use.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) claims that that interpretation
of the law is a stretch and that the consumer must actually buy the
drugs in Canada, and not do it by mail, telephone or Internet order.
However, given that more than one local government buys drugs for their employees
via this route, this makes it highly unlikely that the FDA will succeed in
promoting the more restrictive legal interpretation.
It is assumed that if Kerry is elected, he will more clearly permit drug
re-importation (these drugs are often produced in the U.S., exported to
Canada and then sent back, although some are manufactured directly in
Canada). Alternatively, he may force the drug companies to sell at
prices comparable to what they charge in the rest of the world. Either
way, the result of any new regulation could spell trouble for pharmaceutical firms.
Nationalized healthcare also certainly would not be a boon for the
pharmaceutical industry.
Happily for the drug companies, as of the time this was written, it
is looking more and more likely that President Bush will get re-elected
(this is not a political statement on my part -- I am merely relating
which president is seen as being better for the drug companies). As a
result, several Wall Street firms have begun touting healthcare again.
Certainly, a Republican victory would be a positive for the
pharmaceutical industry. However, the price disparity between the U.S.
and the rest of the world is not going to disappear, and ultimately, the
U.S. government will likely take some action. Although it might take a
Democratic administration, there will be one at some point in time. For
that reason, the big drug companies are not likely to outperform the
market over the long haul just on the basis of a Bush victory in
November.
The withdrawal of the drug Vioxx by Merck took PPH down in what looks
like part of, or possibly the end of, a fifth wave decline (based on
Elliott Wave Theory, which I've written a book on and use heavily in my
analysis). The fund's downside risk is limited to $70.25, or
at worst, $66.90. From the likely low near $67.00, I expect the fund to
rally at least $4.00. There is even a chance that PPH could ultimately
soar back into the mid-$80 range.
|

|
|
|
Investing Doesn't Get Any Easier Than This |
Stock picker Amy
Calistri's strategy is as simple as investing gets -- just one idea
a month designed to make money in today's market. Invest this way
and you don't have to worry about oil prices, automaker bailouts, or
what the Fed is up to -- because every "bad" economic development
actually helps some investment or another.Your investing life can
get a lot simpler -- starting today.
Go here to learn about Amy's simple investing strategy.
|
|
|